2017 Ford Ranger XLT VS 2018 Ford Expedition

2017 Ford Ranger XLT

Its not the cheapest dual-cab ute on the market but there are good reasons why fords ranger remains one of the most popular pick-ups in the country. Priced just shy of $ 60, 000, the up-spec ranger XLT is powered by a 147k w and 470 nm, 3. 2-litrefive-cylinder engine that excels under most driving conditions. The 2. 2 tonne ute is particularly impressive towing a big caravan, while our judges loved the way it handled a big load in the tray. A credit to ford australia, the ranger is one of few utes that ride and handle wellloaded up or not, and the spacious and practical cabin plus a rear tub with 12-volt socket and two built-in lights is hard to beat.

The electric-assisted steering and forgiving ride also make it a front runner for day-to-day driving duties. A measure of its under-stressed performance is one of the best fuel economy figures on test 13. 1L/ 100km. The ranger also scored points for its user-friendly SYNC 3 infotainment system, dual-mode reversing camera and driving aids like radar cruise control that are unavailable on most of its rivals. But if we had to criticise, it would be for the penny-pinching cloth upholstery and manual seat adjustment in XLT grade, while some of the driver aids can be over-sensitive in traffic. Ranked in the top three of all judging categories, with the exception of interior and cost of ownership, the ranger was only narrowly pipped by the amarok V 6 for overall honours

2018 Ford Expedition

Ford's full size SUV gets a renew for 2018and managed to shed some weight along the way. Following in the footsteps of ford's popular F- 150 pickup truck, the new expedition gets an aluminum body and other lightweight componentsto shave about 300 pounds of its previous chunky frame. The new expedition also piles on new comfort, convenienceand safety features. The updated 3. 5 liter eco boost V 6 gets a start/stop system to save fuel, such as when you're sitting at a stoplight.

The engine automatically turns off. The new expedition's also going to be offered with rear wheel drive or four wheel drive hooked up to a new 10 speed automatic transmission. Inside, there's seating for seven or eight. Ford also says there's more room in the third row seat. Infotainment upgrades include available sync 3 with android auto and apple car play compatibility. Available safety equipment includes automatic emergency braking, lane-keeping assist, and adaptive cruise control.

All of these updates are likely to do wonders for the expedition. The last one we tested got a paltry 14 miles per gallon overall in our testing, and had a cheap interior. And it also felt really outdated compared to the more modern competition from general motorsincluding the chevrolet tahoe and suburban. The expedition's strengths include strong towing performance and high marks from owners for satisfaction and reliability. Expect to see the new expedition in showrooms this fall.

2009 Chevrolet Malibu VS 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air

2009 Chevy Malibu

 That's the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety's front crash of a 2009 Chevrolet Malibu and a 1959 Chevrolet Bel Air. In slow motion, you can see the differences in how the new and classic cars perform in this version of the traditional frontal offset test.

The institute conducted this test to commemorate its 50th anniversary and it dramatically shows how much improvement has been made in passenger protection since the nonprofit organization opened its doors. The two cars collide in an explosion of metal, glass, and plastics.

Where the Malibu crumple zone absorbs much of the crash forces ahead of the windshield the Bel Air structure allows the lighter car to compress the passenger compartment. The impact is made worse for the Bel Air driver by the lack of airbags, head restraint and even a seat belt. As a result injuries to the neck, chest, and both legs would be likely.

1959 Chevrolet Bel Air

Consequently, the Bel Air receives a poor rating across the board. On the other hand, the modern Malibu provides good protection with a dummy movement being well controlled. Measures indicate a low risk to most body regions though a foot injury would be possible. Beyond the safety gear, advancements in vehicle engineering give the Malibu a clear advantage in this match up.

While classic cars are often considered to be rock solid this '59 demonstrates how much better today's cars are and the IIHS has played a key role in driving these advancements. In the past 50 years, the Institute has made a real impact. The roads today are safer for it.

2012 Chevrolet Suburban Review

 Today we are here with the 2012 Chevrolet Suburban, an SUV that still gives you the capability to haul close to 10,000 pounds. And up to nine people all the way to Grandma's house as long as you have to bring a few hundred bucks for gas 2012 marks your number six for the current generation suburban.

2012 Chevrolet Suburban

2012 Chevrolet Suburban Review

It still packs a pretty refined ride and plenty of room but some drivability issues are starting to show its age. If you don't need all that capability better options exist the Suburbans 5.3 liter v8 gets the job done even when you're loaded up with passengers but it takes its time a lumbering up to highway speeds. The ford expedition feels similarly modest but Lead-foot will really like cars like the Toyota sequoia whose 5.7 liter v8 feels much more potent.

None of them have the accelerator lag that plagues the suburban our test car took a half second or more sometimes to respond to the accelerator it's really annoying. Make sure you pay attention to it around town on your test drive like you'd expect in a big SUV ride quality is very good. But the steering has some gremlins to iron out there's a lot of play in the wheel especially pointed at twelve o'clock on the highway and you end up having to make a lot of Corrections.

2012 Chevrolet Suburban Interior

 Not really a good thing for an SUV that's going to be on a lot of road trips at least you'll have plenty of room on to those trips to throw all your stuff behind the third row in the suburban is about 45 cubic feet of cargo room. That's a lot of room the related Chevy Tahoe has less than 20 cubic feet if you fold all the seats down you're looking at about a hundred and forty cubic feet of maximum cargo volume. A ton of space there to the vast majority of suburban shoppers will get the 1500 version which has the 5.3 liter v8 for maximum towing capacity, and payload there's a suburban 2500 with a 6-litre v8 it gets 12 miles per gallon and combined EPA city/highway ratings which means that you really need its capability or you just really love the coffee at your local gas station.

The 1500 get some more sensible 17 miles per gallon which beats the sequoia as well as the Nissan armada and the ford expedition, but if you don't need this sort of towing capacity car-based crossover SUV cost less can hold nearly as many people and get better gas mileage. Most car-based crossover SUV get combined EPA mileage in the twenties so the most minivans which have even more maximum cargo capacity. You get the idea and if you need maximum towing capacity like this then the suburban is a viable choice but if you don't get something that isn't quite so overkill. See you again on the next post, stay tune !